Table of Contents

The Controversy Surrounding the Use of Real Skeletons in the 1982 Movie Poltergeist

Chilling Truth Unveiled: The Shocking Use of Real Skeletons in the 1982 Movie Poltergeist

When it comes to horror movies, the goal is to create an atmosphere of fear and suspense that keeps audiences on the edge of their seats. The 1982 movie Poltergeist, directed by Tobe Hooper and produced by Steven Spielberg, is no exception. However, what many people may not know is that the film used real skeletons during certain scenes, sparking a controversy that still lingers to this day. In this article, we will delve into the details of this controversy, exploring the reasons behind the decision to use real skeletons, the ethical implications, and the impact it had on the movie industry.

The Use of Real Skeletons: Fact or Fiction?

Before we dive into the controversy, it is important to establish whether the use of real skeletons in Poltergeist is indeed a fact or merely a myth. The answer, unfortunately, is not as straightforward as one might hope. While there is evidence to suggest that real skeletons were used, there are also conflicting reports that claim otherwise.

According to some sources, the production team of Poltergeist acquired real human skeletons from a medical supply company due to their cost-effectiveness compared to synthetic alternatives. These skeletons were allegedly used in the iconic swimming pool scene, where the characters are seen floating in a pool filled with skeletons and decomposing bodies. The decision to use real skeletons was supposedly made to enhance the realism of the scene and create a more chilling effect.

However, other sources, including members of the cast and crew, have vehemently denied these claims. They argue that the skeletons used in the movie were, in fact, not real but rather made from plastic or rubber. These individuals maintain that the rumors surrounding the use of real skeletons are nothing more than urban legends that have persisted over the years.

The Ethical Implications

Whether or not real skeletons were used in Poltergeist, the ethical implications of such a decision cannot be ignored. If the allegations are true, it raises serious questions about the treatment of human remains and the respect owed to the deceased.

Using real skeletons in a movie, especially without the explicit consent of the individuals involved, is highly controversial. It raises concerns about the commodification of human remains and the potential violation of cultural and religious beliefs surrounding death and burial practices. Additionally, it can be seen as a disregard for the dignity and sanctity of the deceased.

Furthermore, the use of real skeletons in Poltergeist, if proven true, would also raise questions about the safety and health risks involved. Human remains can carry diseases and pathogens, posing a potential threat to the cast and crew who came into contact with them during filming.

The Impact on the Movie Industry

Regardless of whether real skeletons were used in Poltergeist, the controversy surrounding the film had a significant impact on the movie industry. It brought to light the need for stricter regulations and guidelines regarding the use of human remains in movies.

Following the release of Poltergeist, there was a public outcry demanding greater transparency and accountability in the film industry. This led to increased scrutiny and regulation of the use of real skeletons and other human remains in movies. Today, filmmakers are required to obtain proper permits and documentation when using human remains, ensuring that they are sourced ethically and legally.

The controversy also sparked a broader conversation about the ethical boundaries of horror movies and the responsibility of filmmakers to their audiences. It forced filmmakers to consider the potential impact of their creative choices on society and to weigh the desire for realism against the potential harm it may cause.

Q&A

1. Were real skeletons used in the movie Poltergeist?

The use of real skeletons in Poltergeist is still a subject of debate. While some sources claim that real skeletons were used, others, including members of the cast and crew, deny these allegations.

2. Why would the production team choose to use real skeletons?

If real skeletons were indeed used, one possible reason for this decision could be cost-effectiveness. Real skeletons may have been more affordable compared to synthetic alternatives.

3. What are the ethical implications of using real skeletons in movies?

The use of real skeletons raises concerns about the treatment of human remains, the violation of cultural and religious beliefs, and the potential health risks involved. It can be seen as a disregard for the dignity and sanctity of the deceased.

4. How did the controversy surrounding Poltergeist impact the movie industry?

The controversy led to increased regulation and scrutiny of the use of human remains in movies. Filmmakers are now required to obtain proper permits and documentation when using human remains, ensuring ethical and legal sourcing.

5. What broader conversation did the controversy spark?

The controversy prompted a discussion about the ethical boundaries of horror movies and the responsibility of filmmakers to their audiences. It forced filmmakers to consider the potential impact of their creative choices on society.

Summary

The controversy surrounding the use of real skeletons in the 1982 movie Poltergeist remains a topic of debate to this day. While some sources claim that real skeletons were used, others deny these allegations. Regardless of the truth, the controversy shed light on the ethical implications of using human remains in movies, including concerns about the treatment of the deceased and potential health risks. It also led to increased regulation and scrutiny of the film industry, ensuring that proper permits and documentation are obtained when using human remains. Ultimately, the controversy sparked a broader conversation about the ethical boundaries of horror movies and the responsibility of filmmakers to their audiences.